Not only the "Animal Trade" has the problem of "Anti-Everything-Activists",
in many country's of civilization it will not be possible even to build
a new Children's Hospital because some Greenie's found a Frog on the place
of construction. But however its the Animal Trade they most dislike and
so in their opinion it can only be illegal. Most of these green Activists
are very simple peoples with more often than not low intelligence and
no feeling for law and right. They have no knowledge about the matter
they are fighting for, they just "feel" to be right. But such
an feeling has nothing to do with it being legal or illegal.
Most of the animal trade today is working on a legal basis and most of
the green activists are working illegally and as criminals. they don't
care about the law and the right of others, like every other Criminal,
they have a reason and an intention.
But mostly these simple people are used by real criminal organisation
with the cover of doing nature protection but really are interested in
commerce with the "holy cover" or are involved in really Political
Crime Cases. No questions, Nature protection is most important and none
who is working inside the wildlife trade will be against them as all these
people do have very close feeling for wildlife and for founded requests
of changing something we always are open. But we will never be victims
of poor criminal attacks from a small group of Bandits.
How do Green Terrorists working?
First they need no proof of anything, If they feel they dislike something
so they will attack by:
||Insulting the Victim (Normal people
with some human rights)
||Distributing lies about him in some publications or on the internet
||Calling mainly on the internet for actions against them
||Writing untrue mails about him or to other organisation's, the press
||Attacking them by violent force
||Organizing demonstrations on his home, business or some airports
||Pressing airlines with bomb-attacks if they transport animals
||Bombing the facilities of the victim
||Also murdering has been reported by the FBI
||and many more criminal attacks
They are organized in closed groups and circle, some of them are listed
with the FBI as terrorist organisation's. So it is not to take as fun
to get attacked by such criminals, it can be a great danger even for the
lives of the victim. River Zoo Farm many times was target and victim of
such criminal organisation's, always with out any reason as River Zoo
Farm is only working fully according to national and international laws.
In the following we will publish some mails, correspondence and information
from such green terrorist against River Zoo Farm.
(kursive = moderation)
Prince Aga Khan is one of the leaders of WWF
Prinz Aga Khan
This article appears in the October 13, 1995 issue of Executive Intelligence
Review. [PARA]Sadruddin Aga Khan:[NL]mujahideen coordinator[PARA]by Scott
Thompson and Joseph Brewda[PARA]Prince Sadruddin Aga Khan, the second
son of the hereditary Imam of the Ismaili sect of Shi'ism, is a specialist
in running intelligence operations under humanitarian cover. A career
U.N. bureaucrat, and the former coordinator of U.N. Humanitarian and Economic
Assistance Programs relating to Afghanistan, Prince Sadruddin was deeply
involved in providing safe haven for the Afghan mujahideen, and facilitating
their dispersal throughout the world. Because of this role, Prince Sadruddin
was the British government's preferred candidate for U.N. secretary general
in 1991, even ahead of Boutros Boutros-Ghali, the third-generation British
agent who landed the job.[PARA]The Ismaili line of Imams traces its lineage
directly back to the Prophet Mohammed. The family's most notorious
ancestors, the "Assassins," built up a powerful cult presence
in Iran, where the family resided until the 1840s, when they were driven
into India. There, they became a military arm of the British raj, including
in operations in Afghanistan. Prince Sadruddin's grandfather, Aga Khan
II, was a founder of the Muslim League, sponsored by the British in the
wake of the Sepoy
Rebellion of 1858; its activities ultimately led to the vivisection of
India in 1947. His father, who was the 48th Imam, Sir Sultan Mohammed
Shah Aga Khan III, was very close to the British royal family during his
72-year reign, and held the post of chairman of the League of Nation's
General Assembly for a year. The 49th Imam, Prince Agha Khan IV, was given
the British title "His Highness" by Queen Elizabeth II in 1957
at the death of his grandfather. Prince Sadruddin's title is likewise
recognized by the British royal family.[PARA]
Prince Sadruddin Aga Khan's career began in the 1950s, when he became
publisher of the Paris Review, one of the more important Anglo-American
intelligence operations of its day, peddling the degenerate "Children
of the Sun," who were precursors of the rock-drug-sex counterculture.
The managing editor of the publication, John Train, had been Prince Sadruddin's
roommate at Harvard. Train went on to become a top Wall Street financial
adviser, while continuing to play a key behind-the-scenesrole in diverse
intelligence operations, including in Afghanistan (see article, p. 18).
Train and Prince Sadruddin continue to form a team.[PARA]In the mid-1950s,
Prince Sadruddin became a career U.N. civil servant. By 1962, he was U.N.
deputy high commissioner for refugees, and he served as high commissioner
for refugees during 1967-77. Since that time, he has been brought back
to handle special crises dealing with the mass relocation of impoverished
people, especially in war zones. Thus, he was made coordinator of the
U.N. Humanitarian and Economic Assistance Programs relating to Afghanistan,
working closely with John Train, in what was code-named Operation Salam.[PARA]Operation
Salam was officially intended to organize the repatriation of Afghan refugees
after the Soviet withdrawal. But under this pretext, it also oversaw the
dispersal of Afghan war veterans and refugees throughout the world, and
even before the fighting had stopped. Prince Sadruddin's program also
reportedly was involved in the military training and covert military supply
of the Afghan mujahideen, who often operated out of U.N. refugee camps
that he administered on the Pakistan-Afghanistan border.[PARA]Even earlier,
Prince Sadruddin was asked by his longtime tennis partner, Vice President
George Bush, to undertake secret negotiations with the Iranian government,
on behalf of freeing the U.S. hostages. During the same period, some of
the arms flowing into Pakistan for use by the Afghan mujahideen were being
diverted to Iran on behalf of the "Iran-Contra" deals.[PARA]Great
Games and the WWF[PARA]Prince Sadruddin has also been a key figure in
Prince Philip's World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), the British royal family's
most important intelligence agency.
Since its creation in 1961, he has been one of is primary funders, as
has his nephew, the current leader of the sect. Through his London-based
Aga Khan Foundation and the associated Geneva-based Bellerive Foundation,
Prince Sadruddin has emerged as a top environmentalist. Here too, we find
John Train, an activist in WWF Africa causes especially. Train's cousin
Russell Train was president of the U.S. chapter of the WWF from its inception
until his recent retirement.[PARA]In 1983, the WWF successfully persuaded
the Pakistani government to create two national parks directly on the
Afghan border in the northern region of Chitral. The remote region is
not particularly renowned either for its abundance of animal life or the
existence of endangered species, and presumably the flow of eco-tourists
into the region diminished during the Afghan War. Chitral is, however,
renowned for the quality and abundance of its opium poppy, which was assiduously
cultivated by the mujahideen. It was also a primary staging area for smuggling
arms into Afghanistan.[PARA]Around the same time that the WWF established
its Pakistan parks, followers of the Aga Khan began pouring into Chitral,
and the nearby regions of Gilgit and Hunza, also adjacent to Indian Kashmir.
There, they have formed alliances with the British-steered Kashmiri independence
movement, and are reportedly working on establishing an independent Ismaili
State carved out of Pakistan.
An other criminal Organisation is IUCN
Many members of these organisations are serious and well established
scientists and doing good work. However it looks they are being used by
the most doubtfully leaders of this organisation to cook their own soup.
The local director in Guinea-Bissau is the African NELSON DIAS and professional
liar. He was a former Secretary of state but has been dismissed, now he
is the right guy for IUCN Dias is Director of IUCN but he has not even
a little knowledge about Fauna. As soon as he is talking, he is lying
he also is very racist against white people. IUCN made it clear, this
is the position of this criminal organisation too and Dias has spoken
for IUCN This organisation is using the money of these white people they
dislike, but all this shows the level of such green criminal organisation's.
Chronicle of IUCN-Attack against River Zoo Farm / Guinea-Bissau
Starts with unfounded publishing's about us on the internet. River Zoo
Farm are Capturing of Tursiops truncatus (Dolphin) in the waters
of Guinea-Bissau. There was not even a planning at this time.
Nelson Diaz from IUCN Bissau comes together with some former officials
and some very suspect people from "Oceanium Heuluk" Dakar/Senegal
to our Farm. He was very aggressive. Some of his"Heuluk"-peoples
give me the impression to be
Junkies as I'm a lawyer and former police officer. As Diaz told, they
are "very close to IUCN" it will be possible to see there also
The Heuluc peoples made against my request filming of our facility and
of us. Also we found out, they made illegal voice recordings by a covered
voice recorder. Diaz first told, they are"Governmental Journalists".
But the officials from Guinea-Bissau
did not confirm this. Then Diaz told, this are "his Journalists"
and they can do what ever they want and to film here. To me he said "White
people have no rights in my country".
Later on the Chief of the Police told us, it was wrong not to call the
Police immediately as this was a criminal act of IUCN!
On his day of visit Diaz also told to me:
||He doesn't like white investments in his country as
this is neo-colonialism
||We have stolen our farm-Ground as white people cannot get legal
ground in Africa
||About an Publication we made together with the Chairman of the IUCN
Otter Specialist Group about a new finding of Otter in Guinea-Bissau,
Diaz told, we do not have the right to do scientific publications
about his country.
||When he asked us, who is operating this Farm and we told him we,
Family Schuhmann, he told, we can not operate such a Farm as foreigners,
this only can only be done by the Government or the Population (Guinea-Bissau
has not been a communist country for 25 years)
Also he gives an example of his intelligence and knowledge of native
fauna for example by telling us:
||The Monkeys are protected in CITES I (He
means the common Green Monkey)
||The Dolphins are worldwide CITES I and are living only on the cost
||An Felis serval he called "Onca" (Panthera
pardus leopardus) is being kept without permission
||Soft-Shell Turtles (Cyclanorbis senegalensis) not listed
on CITES he called CITES I
||He also stated, all our CITES are falsifications as the CITES Director
cannot issue CITES, this only can the Minister after asking IUCN
As he did not stop to talk and was not interested in any other opinion,
also we found out his lack of intelligence we did not go into a large
conversation with him as he is not important.
I informed His Excellency the Minster of Agriculture and Forest in Bissau
about this Visit and told to be disappointed about the illegal filming.
The Minister told me, not to be worry, the Ministry will clear this especially
as the Ministry found not anything illegal on our work.
First in the "National Radio", later in the day also in "Radio
Bombolom", "RTP Africa" (international) "RFI"
(international) "BBC" (international) was an interview from
Nelson Diaz telling, IUCN will close our establishment. Herby Diaz and
the Reporter of this interview clearly were talking about a publishing
Especially (but not only) IUCN/Diaz stated in criminal intention to destroy
us and here are some examples of his lies.
||Hans-Jörg Schuhmann (full name!!!) is working since
11 years old illegally in Guinea-Bissau (An absolute
||We are working illegally together with people from the Wildlife
Department (A lie, we are working very well with
|| All the documents of Schuhmann are falsification (He
must be sick this criminal)
||We intend to build an Zoo here (never-but why
||We got 99 ha Farm Ground from the Ministry to do agriculture and
tourism but we doing illegal Wildlife trading here (There
is much more then 99 ha we bought from the population for creating
||We are working together with two "accomplices " from the
Wildlife Department (The Minister was really disappointed
about this defamation from IUCN)
||The animals we are dealing in are demanded international but all
of them are protected by law and so we are working illegally (This
sick guy don't know the CITES regulations)
||We are exporting illegal Dolphins, Chimpanzees and Manatees. Dolphins
are living only in Guinea-Bissau (Not to comment,
||Portugal are interested in filling there Aquariums, also China,
they want 100 Dolphins
||All our Work is illegal by the CITES convention (This
guy not even know the CITES convention, he is too simple)
||IUCN want Guinea-Bissau to change the law
||We do illegal publishing's on our web site(Illegal
publishing's are made only by IUCN/Diaz)
||IUCN is calling all against us
||"A foreign company has to pay taxes" so far he giving
the impression we do not. Reality is, we are paying the most taxes
in this sector. I'm in doubt, Diaz paid his taxes.
||We are telling, we are doing Agriculture and tourism, but this is
not true. (True is, we never told this as it is
||We are involved in an "Chimpanzee net" to Mexico (I
did not know why he said this, but there is nothing ongoing in chimpanzees)
||IUCN discovered our Chimpanzee deal and then we stopped this (Well,
he is sick, but he lie this only to damage us, No Chimpanzee deal
||We confirmed to IUCN we are exporting using the Airport (The
||Two Directors from Wildlife are giving us the documents, but they
only can be given from the Minister (These two
Directors are the CITES Managers in Guinea-Bissau and are giving us
the CITES according to the law only)
This we have recorded on types!!
All this Diaz stated in the name of IUCN !!!!
I send an E-Mail to IUCN as I cannot believe this is the opinion and the
order of IUCN. No response from them. So far it is clear, Diaz get the
orders from IUCN.
The Ministry published a statement in the press: Saying the statement
of IUCN is not true. On the same time in "Radio National" ,
"Radio Bombolom" and "RTP Africa" is an Interviewee
with Mario Schuhmann, clarify the attacks of IUCN / Diaz as controversy
and absolute lies.
The Directors for State Security is requesting that we present all our
documents. Result: Everything is legal. We are victims of criminal attacks
Statement of the Ministry in the Radio. The General Director said, all
the information given by IUCN to the press about River Zoo Farm are false.
In fact the same Diaz stated in the Radio and today in the Newspapers
"Diario de Bissau" and "Gazetta". Calling us "Animal
Smugglers", "Illegal Wildlife Traffic" "IUCN discovered
illegal wildlife traffic in Guinea-Bissau" and always with our full
names and the one of our company's. He stated in the paper, we sold an
Eagle given to us by the Wildlife department for care as this bird was
confiscated from fisherman and had leg-bands from Germany. This Bird,
later on was released on the 16th of march by the Minister personally
in front of the press and in close cooperation with the "Vogelwarte
Hidensee" in Germany.
Our US Partner will go to an US-Court asking for an Urgent-Order to stop
IUCN. We made the decision first to fight against IUCN in the public as
we got plenty of "good ammunition" against them. We was publishing
statements in our round mailings
(8,500 "animal" addresses) and we informed the international
IUCN / Diaz stole pictures from our web site, showing my son personally
to publish together with lies and insults in their own internet-publications
Diaz published the same lies and his incompetence but in the name of his
"AD" ONG, financed by IUCN and an political ONG with the title
"Criminoso Negocio de Fauna Selvagem" in the "Gazetta Bissau"
a Newspaper also again with his lies, his insulting and by telling open
In fact the same lies then in the Newspaper from the 9-3-04 is again in
the Radio "RTP Africa" But there is spoken from "discovered
by IUCN" (We do have this on tape-recorder for
the court case)
The Minister together with the international and National Press as well
as the Chief of the Wildlife Department are visiting our Farm. The Minister
re-released the Osprey (The one we sold in the lies of IUCN). The Minister
told in front of the press, the investigations against River Zoo Farm
did not give any reason for actions. We are working absolutely legal by
national and international law and regulation. The Government will be
interested in us expanding our establishment and was glad about our good
cooperation with the Wildlife Authorities and our active fauna protection.
The Wildlife Chef later on in front of the press showed to be disappointed
about the lies of IUCN. The Native King of the Region stated, our good
relationship to the King and to the population and we are most helpful
to them. He also stated we got our farm-ground absolutely legal as the
public ground is still in the responsibility of the King (Reglo).
After 16-3-04 many days
In many Radio and TV reports these visits and the interviews was published
I think minimum 30 times in various TV Channals national and international.
The absolute tendency of the national and international press now: "Worst
contraversies from IUCN against River Zoo Farm".
IUCN asked for silence in the public `till the end of the own investigations.
We agreed for 14 Days.
Subject: RE: River Zoo Farm
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 21:03:33 +0200
From: "ZACCAGNINI Giuseppe" <email@example.com>
To: "Riverzoofarm" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Dear Mr. Schuhmann,
I acknowledge with thanks your follow-up message, and apologize for not
responding yesterday, a Sunday and a holiday here in Switzerland.
I have reviewed with due care the document you sent to me with your
e-mail of 27 March 2004 ("Chronic of IUCN-Attack against River Zoo
/ Guinea-Bissau"). Additionally, and in order to ensure as complete
understanding as possible of your allegations, I reviewed information,
documentation and recordings I obtained by a number of persons internal
to IUCN in reference to your document, including a number of official
Government reports and legislative/regulatory provisions.
On the basis of the above, I have come to the conclusion that the vast
majority of your allegations (and certainly all the ones that are or may
be of any relevance) are not founded in fact. Indeed, the statements
that you say or imply to have been made by IUCN (through its
representative, Mr. Nelson Dias) presumably to the detriment of River
Zoo Farm either are truthful or, alternatively, were not made by IUCN
but rather by a third party. In the first case (i.e., where a truthful
statement of fact was involved), generally you would not have grounds
for legal action against IUCN, whether in defamation or otherwise. In
the second case (i.e., statements published not by IUCN but by third
parties), if such statements are false then you would have to seek
redress not from IUCN but from the party/parties who made them.
I am not going to address and refute specifically each of the
allegations you have made, since I believe that many of them, on their
face, are clearly unfounded or irrelevant. I will say, however, that a
number of official Government documents that I have been able to review
corroborate to my full satisfaction the truthfulness of any statements
you maintain were made/published by IUCN to the detriment of River Zoo
Farm, on issues including the following: your failure to comply with
legal requirements regarding the surface-area of the land granted to
River Zoo Farm and regarding the specified agricultural use that was to
be made of that land; the presence on the River Zoo Farm premises of
captive animals belonging to endangered species protected under
Guinea-Bissau and international laws; and the fact that the delegation
that visited River Zoo Farm of 28 January 2004 and of which IUCN's Mr.
Dias was a member, constituted an official Government mission that
included the Directors General of Forests and of the Environment (the
findings of said mission clearly being set forth in an official
Government report dated 11 February 2004).
In closing, I wish to reiterate my thanks to you for allowing me the
time and opportunity to review this matter and to get back to you with
my reasoned opinion, being perfectly aware that you will not be in
agreement with this opinion. However, I also reiterate in no uncertain
terms that, unless you cease and desist immediately from publishing,
through whatever medium, false and detrimental allegations about IUCN
and/or its representative Mr. Dias, we will not hesitate to institute
legal proceedings against you, River Zoo Farm and any other party
responsible for such publications, with the objective of protecting
IUCN's interests to the full extent under the law of any relevant
jurisdiction. Alternatively, and should you be the one to file legal
proceedings against IUCN (as you repeatedly have threatened to do), you
can rest assured that we will not only defend vigorously and
successfully against such a lawsuit but also will counterclaim against
you, River Zoo Farm and any other responsible party for all the damages
and expenses sustained by IUCN as a result of your unfounded
allegations and legal action.
I trust the above clearly sets forth IUCN's position, to which I hope
you will give due consideration.
Giuseppe M. Zaccagnini
Subject: RE: River Zoo Farm
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:42:47 +0200
From: "ZACCAGNINI Giuseppe" <email@example.com>
To: "Riverzoofarm" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
No, Mr. Schuhmann, I do not agree with the use you propose to make of
e-mail. The e-mail was written in the context of a good-faith process
(at least on my part) to try to resolve this controversy in an amicable
fashion, but by posting it on your web site you are now seeking to make
it a part of that controversy.
Am I concerned about your publishing my e-mail? Frankly, no, as I do
not see how it could possibly benefit your cause, whatever that may be.
What I am concerned about is your threat to continue defamatory
publications, including that of your "Chronic," which contains
false allegations about IUCN and its activities. I believe that this
will further strengthen IUCN's grounds for legal action against you and
River Zoo Farm, and I urge you to not do it. Obviously, that is your
responsibility and your decision, and I trust you will proceed in full
awareness of the possible consequences of your actions.
Giuseppe M. Zaccagnini
Just one of some hundreds mails we got from green
activists only to show about their "intelligence" and mentality,
This low educated person does not even shame to bring the tragedy from
the holocaust and an modern marine world to the same level, We do shame
Received: (qmail 44584 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2004 14:33:28 -0000
Received: from mail.space.net (18.104.22.168)
by popmail.space.net with SMTP; 30 Jan 2004 14:33:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 72492 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2004 14:33:22 -0000
Received: from delorean.alinto.net (HELO alinto.net) (22.214.171.124)
by mail.space.net with SMTP; 30 Jan 2004 14:33:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 29265 invoked by uid 64); 30 Jan 2004 14:33:17 -0000
Received: from email@example.com by alinto.net with - (uvscan: v4.2.40/v4321.
. Clean); 30 Jan 2004 14:33:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO terry.funradio.fr) (192.168.51.14)
by smtp1.alinto.net with SMTP; 30 Jan 2004 14:33:01 -0000
Received: from accueilfun
œFri, 30 Jan 2004 15:32:33 +0100
From: "Blondeau Aline" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: about captures of dolphins...
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:32:33 +0100
Organization: Groupe RTL
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
To the terrorist leader,
I have just been informed that you have captured some dolphins. Who
gives you the right to think that you can control their lives
?????!!!!!!!! These animals are free. They live in groups all their
lives. They don't hesitate to rescue us when we are in danger even if
they don't know us !!!!! even when they don't have to !!! THEY DO IT
ALL THE SAME !!!!!! They have demonstrated it in the past. These animals
have a soul more than you !!!!!!!! when the different species of
dolphins lose their family and meet an another species, they are
immediately accepted. They show us their tolerence and their
You are a COWARD and a GREEDY person. I personnally defend all animals,
nature and life in general and I WOULD NEVER DO ANYTHING FOR SOMEONE
LIKE YOU !!!!! YOU HAVE SEPARATED THEM FROM THEIR FAMILIES TO SEND THEM
TO THE TINY TANKS.
DO YOU REMEMBER IN THE PAST ?????? the concentration camps where
children mothers and all the family were separated !!!!!!! It is the
same no more no less !!!!!!!
I know The Greece well and its symbol is the dolphin and in the ancient
Greece, the population respected nature and fellow inhabitants They
lived in perfect harmony... They had already understood the right way
ARE YOU LESS DEVELOPED THAN THE PAST ANCIENT ???? !!!!!!
At the dawn of 21st century, we are stepping backward (with people like
One day, I would like to see how you would react if someone kidnapped
your children and I am sure that you would be the first to cry like a
- To the dolphin, the only one, more than the others, the nature has
given what the best philosopher looks for : unselfish friendship
(Plutarch) Greek philosopher
Vorsicht !!! das wird noch ein Nachspiel haben !!! alles rächt sich
Das werden Sie mir haben Büssen !!!
This only a short display of the methodical of green
Together with security officials River Zoo Farm is working on programmes
to avoid green terrorist attacks, On demand we will consult you. Also
River Zoo Farm will provide with warning list on your request, we also
like to get information's from you about illegal actions of such persons
One of the inside-sources of the green activists is the German Animals
Dealer Peter Bössenecker living in Holland (Den Oven 28 NL-3912 AD
Rhenen) email@example.com Bössenecker will give insider information
from zoo-transactions to the